ISSN 1911-2173

Key to the New World genera of the subfamily Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea: Braconidae) and synopses of the genera

Accepted: February 29, 2024

Michael Sharkey*

* The Hymenoptera Institute, 1339 La Loma Dr., Redlands, California 92373, USA. msharkey@uky.edu

Abstract

This is an updated overview of the New World (Western Hemisphere) members of the subfamily Agathidinae, including Greenland and the Caribbean Islands. It is a revision of the keys by Sharkey (1997) and Sharkey et al. (2021). It includes a key to the New World genera and a synopsis of each genus. The synopses include the following sections: diagnosis, biology, diversity, distribution, publications, and notes. There are 27 genera in the New World and about twice that number worldwide.

Aerophilus sp. by Steve Marshall
Aerophilus sp. ovipositing into an unknown caterpillar in the flower head of Symphyotrichum lanceolatum (Willdenow). Agathidines, like many other parasitoid wasps, commonly feed on nectar. In this case the plant may be pollinated by the wasp which is also ovipositing into one of the plant’s natural enemies. Photograph taken by Steve Marshall in Inverhaugh, Ontario, Canada.

Sharkey, M.S. 1997. Subfamily Agathidinae, pp.68-83. In: Wharton, R.A., Marsh, P.M., and Sharkey, M.J. (eds). Manual of the New World Genera of the Family Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Special Publication of the International Society of Hymenopterists, 439 pp.

Sharkey, M.J., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., Chapman, E.G., Smith, M.A., Dapkey, T., Brown, A., Ratnasingham, S., Naik, S., Manjunath, R., Perez, K., Milton, M., Hebert, P., Shaw, S.R., Kittel, R.N., Solis, M.A., Metz, M.A., Goldstein, P.Z., Brown, J.W., Quicke, D.L.J., van Achterberg, C., Brown, B.V. & Burns, J.M. 2021. Minimalist revision and description of 403 new species in 11 subfamilies of Costa Rican braconid parasitoid wasps, including host records for 219 species. ZooKeys, 1013: 1-665. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600.

Introduction

The braconid subfamily Agathidinae includes over 50 genera in the world, of which 27 genera have representatives in the New World (Table 1). This article is the first subfamily treatment of the New World genera of Braconidae stemming from the key to subfamilies of Braconidae by Sharkey et al. (2023). Readers using that key will be automatically directed here if they obtain an identification of Agathidinae. The present work includes a key to the New World genera, including those present in Greenland and the Caribbean Islands, and a synopsis of each genus. The synopses include the following sections: diagnosis, biology, diversity, distribution, publications, and notes. Generic concepts have changed radically over the last decade, so the treatment by Sharkey (1997) in the Manual of New World Braconidae (Wharton et al., 1997) is no longer accurate. This is mostly due to the large polyphyletic genus Bassus Fabricius having been broken up. Bassus now refers only to a small genus restricted to the Palearctic and Oriental regions.

Overview of subfamily

Phylogeny

The recent phylogenetic reconstruction of Agathidinae by Sharkey and Chapman (2017) revised the tribal classification of the subfamily. Please see that publication for a full discussion.

Biology

Shaw and Huddleston (1991) provide a thorough review of the biology of the Agathidinae. Most members of the Agathidinae with documented life histories are solitary koinobiont endoparasitoids of concealed lepidopterous larvae; however, most species with ovipositors that are shorter than the metasoma probably attack free-living caterpillars. Agathidines generally attack the first or second instars of their hosts, although there are numerous exceptions. It appears that all species deposit their eggs on the ventral nerve cord and most often in a ganglion of the host caterpillar (Odebiyi and Oatman, 1972, 1977). In all cases, the larval parasitoid spins its cocoon inside the pupal chamber of the host (Nickels et al., 1950; Dondale, 1954; Odebiyi and Oatman, 1972, 1977). Many Neotropical species are brightly colored with various combinations of red, orange, yellow, and black. Most species are diurnal, but many members of Zelomorpha are nocturnal with typical pale coloration and enlarged ocelli.

A few detailed studies of the biology of species of Agathidinae have been conducted. Most notable among the New World species are the following: Simmonds (1947) Cremnops vulgaris (Cresson) (as Agathis vulgaris), a parasitoid of the sugarbeet web-worm (Loxostege sticticalis (Linnaeus)); Dondale (1954) Microdus dimidiator Nees (as Agathis laticinctus (Cresson), a parasitoid of the eye-spotted bud moth Spilonota ocellana (Denis & Schiffermüller); Needham (1955) Alabagrus texanus (Cresson) (as Bassus texanus), a parasitoid of Syllepte picalis (Hampson); Morse (2011) Alabagrus texanus, a parasitoid of Herpetogramma theseusalis (Walker); Balduf (1966) Therophilus calcaratus (Cresson) (as Agathis calcarata), a parasitoid of Acrobasis rubrifasciella Packard; Quednau (1970) Agathis pumila Ratzeburg), a parasitoid of the larch case-bearer Coleophora laricella (Hübner); Odebiyi and Oatman (1972, 1977) Agathis gibbosa (Say) and Lytopylus unicoloratus (Schrottky) (as Agathis unicolor Schrottky), parasitoids of the potato tuberworm Phthorimaea operculella (Zeller); and Hummelen (1974) Alabagrus stigma (Brullé), (as Agathis stigmaterus (Cresson)), a parasitoid of the sugarcane borer Diatraea saccharalis (Fabricius). Each of these works gives a detailed account of the immature stages and most assess the value of the parasitoids as natural control agents.

Common genera

In the Nearctic, the most common and diverse genera are Agathis Latreille, Therophilus Wesmael, and Aerophilus Szépligeti. In the Neotropics, Zelomorpha Ashmead, Alabagrus Enderlein, Lytopylus Förster, and Chilearinus Sharkey are most abundant and diverse.

Distribution

Worldwide. Generally, agathidines are more diverse in humid tropical regions, but some genera such as Agathis and Earinus are exceptional in that they are more speciose in temperate North America and Chilearinus is most abundant in southern temperate regions of South America. The genera Zelomorpha, Agathirsia Westwood, Agathis and Crassomicrodus Ashmead, have members that prefer arid habitats.

Distinguishing features

Most agathidines can be recognized by the following combination of characters: forewing M+Cu not tubular in basal third or more; forewing RS vein complete to wing margin and terminating far basad the apex of the wing, except Mesocoelus Schulz and Plesiocoelus van Achterberg, which lack the last abscissa of RS.; occipital carina absent; second submarginal cell of forewing usually present (95%), small, and quadrate (20%) or triangular (80%).

Note

The type specimen of the type species of Liopisa Enderlein, L. peruensis (Szépligeti), appears to be lost. I suspect that it is a junior synonym of Zelomorpha.

Checklist

Table 1. List of New World genera of Agathidinae.

Key to genera

Key to New World genera of Agathidinae
Modified from Sharkey et al. (2021). Clicking the hyperlinked text in the key below will take the reader to the
corresponding couplet or genus synopsis.
1.
A. Forewing venation greatly reduced; RS absent and crossvein r present only as a short stub; Neotropical, rare.
B. Forewing venation moderately reduced; apical abscissa of RS absent, or mostly so, but crossvein r complete to junction of RS; Neotropical, rare.
C. Forewing venation not significantly reduced; apical abscissa of RS complete or almost complete to wing margin; widespread, common (99+ % of specimens).
Figures for couplet 1
2(1).
A. Hind wing subbasal (SB) cell 4-sided with vein Cub emanating from an angle in the cell AND/OR AA. Posterior surface of scutellum with a semi-circular or arc-shaped depression (post-scutellar depression).
B. Hind wing subbasal (SB) cell 3-sided. If Cub vein is present, it is not tubular and it emanates from a straight vein. BB. Posterior surface of scutellum without a semi-circular or arc-shaped depression, but rugose sculpture often present.
Figures for couplet 2
3(2).
A. Median area of first tergum not raised above lateral portions and granulate or striogranulate. AA. Hind coxal cavities (HCC) open to metasomal foramen or narrowly closed and positioned partly above ventral margin of metasomal foramen (MF). If present, transverse carinae above coxal cavities curved.
B. Median area of first tergum raised above lateral portions, sculpture variable but often smooth or smoothly striate. BB. Hind coxal cavities closed and positioned completely below the metasomal foramen; ventral margin of metasomal foramen with a strong, straight transverse carina (TC).
Figures for couplet 3
4(1).
A. Foretarsal claws bifid.
B. Foretarsal claws simple, with distinct basal lobe.
C. Foretarsal claws simple, lacking a distinct basal lobe.
Figures for couplet 4
5(4).
A. Forewing areolet quadrate, not or only slightly narrowed anteriorly. AA. Ovipositor as long as or longer than half the length of metasoma.
B. Forewing areolet triangular or if quadrate much narrower anteriorly. BB. Ovipositor shorter than half the length of metasoma.
Figures for couplet 5
6(5).
A. Gena expanded into a flange posteriorly; malar space (MS) more than ½ length of eye height (EH); Neotropical, rare.
B. Gena not modified into a flange posteriorly; malar space (MS) less than ½ length of eye height (EH); widespread, common.
Figures for couplet 6
7(5).
A. Body predominantly orange/yellow. AA. Frons bordered by a carina posteriorly; widespread, common.
B. Body predominantly black. BB. Frons not bordered by a carina posteriorly; southern USA through the tropical Neotropics.
Figures for couplet 7
8(7).
A. Propodeum and hind coxa with fine, granulate sculpture; first metasomal tergum almost 3x wider at apex than at base; Neotropical, rare.
B. Propodeum and hind coxa lacking granulate sculpture; first metasomal tergum not nearly 3x wider at apex than at base; widespread, relatively common.
Figures for couplet 8
9(4).
A. Notauli present, though sometimes weak.
B. Notauli completely absent.
Figures for couplet 9
10(9).
A. Ventral margin of clypeus projecting; width of temple longer than width of eye in lateral view; Nearctic, rare.
B. Ventral margin of clypeus not projecting; width of temple shorter than width of eye in lateral view; widespread, common.
Figures for couplet 10
11(10).
A. Frons bordered by carinae or grooves posteriorly.
B. Frons not bordered by carinae or grooves posteriorly.
Figures for couplet 11
12(11).
A. Hind coxa with granulate sculpture. AA. Second submarginal cell minute or absent; Neotropical, rare.
B. Hind coxa smooth, lacking granulate sculpture. BB. Second submarginal cell of normal dimensions; widespread, relatively common.
Figures for couplet 12
13(12).
A. First metasomal tergum smooth with two widely spaced, converging carinae forming a tear-shaped basal area; Neotropical, rare.
B. First metasomal tergum usually smooth and convex, or BB. with a median longitudinal carina, or BBB. rarely with 2 carinae in which case the tergum has more extensive sculpture; widespread, common.
Figures for couplet 13
14(11).
A. Malar space (MS) distinctly more than ½ eye height (EH). Head shape in frontal view elongate, at least as high (measure from ventral margin of clypeus) as wide.
B. Malar distance USUALLY (95%) equal to or less than ½ eye height. Head shape in frontal view wide, wider than high (measure from ventral margin of clypeus).
Figures for couplet 14
15(14).
A. Hind coxal cavities (HCC) open to metasomal foramen or narrowly closed and positioned partly above ventral margin of metasomal foramen (MF). If present, transverse carina curved. AA Pair of carinae on first tergum not prominent. Common in the Nearctic, very rare in the Neotropics.
Agathis (in part)
B. Hind coxal cavities closed and positioned completely below the metasomal foramen; ventral margin of metasomal foramen with a strong, relatively straight transverse carina (TC). BB. Pair of carinae on first tergum prominent. Widespread, common.
Aerophilus (in part)
Figures for couplet 15
16(14).
A. Propodeal spiracle elongate, more than 2x longer than wide; widespread, common.
B. Propodeal spiracle circular or oval, less than 2x longer than wide.
Figures for couplet 16
17(16).
A. Hind coxal cavities (HCC) open to metasomal foramen or narrowly closed and positioned partly above ventral margin of metasomal foramen (MF). If present, transverse carina curved. AA Pair of carinae on first tergum not prominent. Common in the Nearctic, very rare in the Neotropics.
B. Hind coxal cavities closed and positioned completely below the metasomal foramen; ventral margin of metasomal foramen with a strong, relatively straight transverse carina (TC). BB. Pair of carinae on first tergum prominent. Widespread, common.
Aerophilus (in part)
Figures for couplet 17
18(17).
A. First tergum completely smooth, or rarely with some punctures or rugosities laterally.
B. First tergum with obvious sculpture.
Figures for couplet 18
19(18).
A. Cub vein of hind wing long and partly tubular, apical vein of subbasal (SB) cell of hind wing angled at the point from which Cub emanates; widespread, common.
Therophilus (a few species)
B. Cub vein of hind wing weak or absent and never tubular; apical vein of subbasal cell (SB) straight; widespread, moderately common.
Figures for couplet 19
20(19).
A. Notauli pitted or crenulate. Antenna shorter than body and with less than 40 flagellomeres.
Agathirsia (in part)
B. Notauli smooth. Antenna longer than body and with more than 40 flagellomeres.
Figures for couplet 20
21(20).
A. Propleuron with a distinct protuberance. Gena expanded into an acute angle posteroventrally; Neotropical, rare.
B. Propleuron flat or weakly convex, lacking a distinct protuberance. Gena rounded and not expanded posteroventrally; southern Nearctic and Neotropical, rare.
Figures for couplet 21
22(18).
A. First tergum partly or completely granulate; widespread, common.
B. First tergum otherwise sculptured, usually striate or rugosostriate.
Figures for couplet 22
23(22).
A. Posterior apex of scutellum with a distinct depression in the form of a semicircle or two distinct pits (postscutellar depression); widespread, common.
Therophilus (in part)
B. Posterior apex of scutellum lacking depression, smooth to rugose; common in the Nearctic, very rare in the Neotropics.
Agathis (in part)
Figures for couplet 23
24(9).
A. Second submarginal cell of forewing quadrate. AA. Cub vein of hind wing present and often tubular; subbasal cell (SB) angled distally at junction of Cub.
B. Not combining the above character states. B. Second submarginal cell usually triangular. BB. Cub vein of hind wing usually absent or not tubular and subbasal cell (SB) not angled distally. BBB. Widespread, common.
Figures for couplet 24
25(24).
A. Face distinctly punctate AA. Body and antenna black, all femora pale (yellow to orange), hind tibia pale (yellow to orange with black apex and a melanic ring or lateral spot subbasally). AAA. Holarctic and Oriental (in the Americas from northern Canada and rarely as far south as Sonora in northern Mexico,).
B. Face mostly smooth with tiny punctation BB. Often brightly colored and otherwise not as above. BBB. Distribution: Neotropical, Chile, and southern Argentina, and rarely in high altitudes of the Andes far north as Colombia and Ecuador.
Figures for couplet 25
26(24).
A. Hind coxal cavities (HCC) open to metasomal foramen or narrowly closed and positioned partly above ventral margin of metasomal foramen (MF). If present, transverse carina curved. AA Pair of carinae on first tergum not prominent. Common in the Nearctic, very rare in the Neotropics.
B. Hind coxal cavities closed and positioned completely below the metasomal foramen; ventral margin of metasomal foramen with a strong, relatively straight transverse carina (TC). BB. Pair of carinae on first tergum prominent. Widespread, common.
Aerophilus (in part)
Figures for couplet 26
27(26).
A. Spurious vein, RS2b, of forewing well-developed. AA. Ovipositor barely exserted, much shorter than metasoma; Neotropical, very rare.
B. Spurious vein, RS2b, lacking. BB. Ovipositor at least as long as metasoma.
Figures for couplet 27
28(27).
A. Second submarginal cell shorter than its dorsal stem; apical abscissa of RS curving towards fore margin of wing; Neotropical, very rare.
B. Second submarginal cell longer than its dorsal stem; apical abscissa of RS straight.
Figures for couplet 28
29(28).
A. Posterolateral corner of gena sharp; propleuron with a protuberance; Neotropical, rare.
B. Posterolateral corner of gena rounded; propleuron evenly convex, lacking a protuberance; widespread, common.
Figures for couplet 29
30(4).
A. Notauli absent, mesoscutum completely smooth; Neotropical, rare.
B. Notauli present, though sometimes only indicated anteriorly or posteriorly; widespread and common in the Nearctic, rare in the Neotropics.
Figures for couplet 30
31(30).
A. First tergum smooth, lacking microsculpture and pair of longitudinal carinae, at most with punctures laterally.
B. First tergum with microsculpture, usually in the form of longitudinal striae or rugae; widespread and common in the Nearctic, extremely rare in the Neotropics.
Agathis (in part)
Figures for couplet 31
32(31).
A. Ovipositor barely exserted, shorter than half the length of metasoma; tarsal claws simple, lacking basal lobe; Nearctic and Central America, rare.
B. Ovipositor at least as long as half the metasoma, often much longer; tarsal claws usually (80%) with basal lobe; Nearctic and Central America, rare.
Agathirsia (in part)

Generic treatments

Aerophilus Szépligeti, 1902

Diagnosis. The structure of the attachment of the metasoma to the mesosoma (Fig. 1) is unique among New World agathidines. The metasomal foramen is widely separated from the coxal cavities and there is a transverse ridge between them. The structure is shared only by Braunsia Kriechbaumer, an Old World genus.

Biology. Members attack a wide range of lepidopteran families, e.g., Batrachedridae, Coleophoridae, Crambidae, Elachistidae, Gelechiidae, Pyralidae, Thyrididae, and Tortricidae.

Diversity. There are an estimated 300 species globally, of which only about 60 are described.

Distribution. Widespread in the New World in both tropical and temperate regions. Worldwide in distribution, but far less diverse in the Old World.

Publications. Sharkey et al. (2016) revised the eastern North American species and included all USA and Canadian species in a key. Sharkey et al. (2011a) revised many Costa Rican species of this genus under the name Lytopylus, a name that was later found to be erroneously applied.

Note. Most described species were formerly included in Bassus.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Posterior view of metasomal attachment to mesosoma. In all members of Aerophilus the metasomal foramen (MF) is situated well above the hind coxal foramina (HCF) and separated from them by a transverse carina (TC).

Figure 2
Figure 2. Aerophilus abdominalis (Muesebeck).

Agathirsia Westwood, 1882

Diagnosis. Very similar to some species of Crassomicrodus. All Crassomicrodus have simple claws without a basal lobe, whereas most Agathirsia have claws with a basal lobe (Fig. 4B). The ovipositors of Crassomicrodus specimens are short, barely exserted from the apex of the metasoma (couplet 32A); those of Agathirsia are at least as long as half the length of the metasoma (couplet 32B). The mouthparts (galea) of Agathirsia specimens are often elongate (as in couplet 14A), whereas those of Crassomicrodus are not elongate (as in couplet 14B).

Biology. Bibby (1961) cites the larva of Acontia cretata (Grote & Robinson) (Noctuidae) as a host of A. testacea Muesebeck. This is the only host record for the genus. The fact that this host pupates in the soil and that all members of Agathirsia have thick mandibles suited for digging prompted Pucci and Sharkey (2004) to suggest that all species attack members of Noctuidae that pupate in the soil.

Diversity. Thirty-two species are described and there may be an additional 30 species still undescribed.

Distribution. Only known from Mexico and southwestern USA although some species are likely to occur in dry areas of other countries of Central America.

Publications. Pucci and Sharkey (2004) revised the species.

Note. The monophyly of Agathirsia and Crassomicrodus is uncertain.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Undescribed Agathirsia sp.

Figure 3
Figure 4. Tarsal claws. A. Crassomicrodus. B. Agathirsia.

Agathis Latreille, 1804

Diagnosis. Frons not bordered by carina posteriorly (couplet 11b). Head usually elongate and mouthparts (galea) elongate (couplet 14A and Fig. 5A). Hind coxal cavities open to metasomal foramen, or narrowly closed (couplet 15A). Tarsal claws with or rarely without a basal lobe (couplet 4B).

Biology. Lepidopteran host families include the following: Gelechiidae, Coleophoridae, Oecophoridae, Tortricidae, Heliodinidae, Pyraustidae, Cochylidae, Momphidae, Epermeniidae and Incurvariidae, particularly those feeding in flower heads (Simbolotti and van Achterberg, 1999).

Diversity. This is a hard number to determine; 46 species from the West Palearctic are considered valid (Simbolotti and van Achterberg, 1999) but molecular methods were not used to delineate species. There are about seven described Nearctic species from the USA and Canada, but many more undescribed. There are a number of Neotropical species placed in Agathis, but none of these belongs to the genus, e.g., A. alvarengai de Santis and A. amoena Brullé.

Distribution. Agathis is primarily Holarctic and Oriental with a few undescribed species found in Costa Rica, Colombia, and Chile. In the Nearctic they are most diverse in the southwestern USA.

Publications. Muesebeck’s (1927) key is the only one available and it conflates about seven genera treated under Agathis. It also treats only a small fraction of the species. In essence, there is no practical way to identify New World species of Agathis.

Figure 5
Figure 5. Agathis sp.

Alabagrus Enderlein, 1920

Diagnosis. Frons bordered by carinae posteriorly (couplet 11A). First metasomal tergum usually convex or with a median carina (rarely with a pair of carinae that converge medially, but then with other irregular longitudinal striae (couplet 13BB and 13BBB). First metasomal tergum mildly to acutely convex (Fig. 7).

Biology. Exclusively parasitoids of Crambidae.

Diversity. 192 described species and an estimated 800 undescribed species.

Distribution. Restricted to the New World and primarily Neotropical. Alabagrus occurs from southern Canada to Argentina.

Publications. Sharkey (1988) revised the genus and included about 100 species. With the advent of sequence data, it was discovered that many species definitions in this revision were actually species complexes. Leathers and Sharkey (2003) revised the species of La Selva, Costa Rica, and this too is replete with incorrectly circumscribed species. Sharkey et al. (2018) revised the species of Costa Rica concentrating on reared and barcoded specimens from Guanacaste province and those species are accurately delineated.

Note: Astiria Enderlein, 1920, Craspedobothrus Enderlein, 1920, and Liyptia Enderlein, 1920 are junior synonyms of Alabagrus.

Figure 6
Figure 6. Alabagrus brianbrowni Sharkey.

Figure 7
Figure 7. A sampling of the variation found on first metasomal tergum in species of Alabagrus.

Amputoearinus Sharkey, 2006

Diagnosis. Gena acute posteroventrally (couplet 29A). RS+M vein of forewing complete and tubular (Fig. 8C), as in Earinus. Propleuron with a distinct protuberance (couplet 29A). First metasomal tergum smooth and flat (Fig. 8E). Notauli absent (Fig. 8D).

Biology. Amputoearinus niger Lindsay & Sharkey was reared from an undescribed species of Dysodia, Thyrididae (Sharkey et al. 2011a).

Diversity. Sixteen described species and approximately 30 undescribed species.

Distribution. Restricted to the Neotropics and recorded from Mexico to Peru and Brazil.

Publications. Lindsay and Sharkey (2006) revised the genus, which was erected by Sharkey (2006).

Figure 8
Figure 8. Amputoearinus matamata Sharkey.

Aphelagathis Sharkey, 2015

Diagnosis. First median tergite smooth lacking microsculpture and carinae (Fig. 9F). Tarsal claws simple with a large basal lobe (couplet 4B). Notauli deeply impressed and lacking sculpture (Fig. 9B). Frons not margined by carinae (Couplet 11B).

Biology. Hosts are known for two species, and both are parasitoids of grass-feeding Hesperiidae.

Diversity. Eleven described species, an estimated 10 undescribed species.

Distribution. Widespread in the southern half of the USA, south to Costa Rica and the Caribbean islands. Aphelagathis appears to be most diverse in the southwestern USA and northwestern Mexico.

Publications. Sharkey et al. (2015) revised the species.

Note. The sole species described before 2015 was formerly included in Bassus.

Figure 9
Figure 9. Aphelagathis verticalis (Cresson).

Chilearinus Sharkey, 2022

Diagnosis. Notauli absent (Fig. 10C). Second submarginal cell quadrate (Fig. 10B). Cub vein of hind wing present (Fig. 10D). Subbasal cell of hind wing angled where Cub vein intersects (Fig. 10). Tarsal claws with basal lobe (couplet 4B).

Biology. Unknown

Diversity. Hundreds of species of which only five are described.

Distribution. Chile and southern Argentina with a few species in high altitudes as far north as Colombia and Ecuador.

Publications. Sharkey et al. (2022) erected the genus, described two new species, and included other species formerly placed in Earinus.

Figure 10
Figure 10. Chilearinus covidchronos Sharkey, holotype.

Crassomicrodus Ashmead, 1900

Diagnosis. Very similar to some species of Agathirsia. All species of Crassomicrodus have simple claws without a basal lobe (Fig. 12A), whereas most Agathirsia have simple claws with a basal lobe (Fig. 12B). The ovipositors of Crassomicrodus specimens are short, barely exerted from the apex of the metasoma (Fig. 11A); those of Agathirsia are at least as long as half the length of the metasoma (couplet 32B). The mouthparts (galea) of Agathirsia specimens are often elongate (as in couplet 14A), whereas those of Crassomicrodus are not elongate (as in couplet 14B).

Biology. Autographa californica (Speyer) (Noctuidae) attacked by C. fulvescens (Cresson) is the unique host record for the genus.

Diversity. There are 15 described species and about the same number may be undescribed.

Distribution. Primarily North and Central America, but extending to southern Canada, with one record from northwestern Colombia. Most diverse in Mexico and southwestern USA.

Publications. Figueroa et al. (2011) revised the genus.

Note. The monophyly of Agathirsia and Crassomicrodus is uncertain.

Figure 11
Figure 11. Crassomicrodus sp.

Figure 12
Figure 12. Tarsal claws. A. Crassomicrodus. B. Agathirsia.

Cremnops Foerster, 1863

Diagnosis. Malar length at least half the eye height (Fig. 13A). Frons with lateral carinae (Fig. 13B). Notaulus impressed (Fig. 13C). Second submarginal cell quadrate (Fig. 13D). Tarsal claws cleft with basal pectination (Fig. 13E). Propodeum and hind coxa lacking granulate sculpture (couplet 8B).

Biology. Members of the family Crambidae are the usual hosts; other recorded hosts include Tortricidae and Sesiidae, but they may be erroneous.

Diversity. Seventy-seven species are described, 33 of which are found in the New World. There may be another 30 undescribed species worldwide.

Distribution. Worldwide with the highest diversity in temperate North America.

Publications. Tucker et al. (2015) revised the New World species.

Note. Žikić et al. (2011) proposed the genus Neocremnops for a group of New World species with asymmetrical tarsal claws, a character elucidated in Tucker et al. (2015). I do not recognize the genus because there is no evidence that the remaining species of Cremnops form a monophyletic group.

Figure 13
Figure 13. Cremnops spp. (from Tucker et al. 2015).

Earinus Wesmael, 1837

Diagnosis. RS+M vein of forewing complete or almost so (Fig. 14B). Gena rounded posteroventrally. The genus does not occur in the Neotropics.

Biology. Reared from the following families: Coleophoridae, Geometridae, Gracillariidae, Noctuidae, and Tortricidae.

Diversity. Eighteen described species, only five in the New World, and perhaps 20 undescribed species.

Distribution. Primarily temperate Holarctic with several species in the Oriental realm. Restricted to Canada, the USA and northern Mexico (Sonora) in the New World. As the genus name suggests, specimens of the genus are exclusively found in the spring.

Publications. Sharkey et al. (2022) revised the Nearctic species and added two new species. Braet (2002) described two new species of that he assigned to Earinus, however they both belong to Lytopylus and were transferred by Sharkey et al. (2022). Berta (2000) described a new species and presented a key to three Neotropical species. These were transferred to Chilearinus and Lytopylus by Sharkey et al. (2022).

Note. Previously, Sharkey et al. (2006) included a diverse clade from south temperate South America in the genus. However, Sharkey et al. (2022) erected Chilearinus to refer to this group.

Figure 14
Figure 14. Earinus austinbakeri Sharkey, holotype.

Gelastagathis Sharkey, 2015

Diagnosis. Clypeus flared anteriorly and mouth appearing cyclostome-like (Fig. 15D).Temples bulging behind eyes (Fig. 15E).

Biology. Unknown, however the strong rounded mandibles are reminiscent of Agathirsia and Crassomicrodus, therefore soil dwelling caterpillars are the suspected hosts.

Diversity. Two described species and probably fewer than 10 undescribed.

Distribution. Known from the two specimens, one from Texas and one from Massachusetts.

Publications. Sharkey and Chapman (2015) described the genus and the two included species.

Figure 15
Figure 15. Gelastagathis grisselli Sharkey.

Hemichoma Enderlein, 1920

Diagnosis. Claws cleft (couplet 4A). Ovipositor shorter than metasoma (Fig. 16A). Mesoscutum smooth, lacking notauli (Fig. 16B). Gena expanded posteroventrally (couplet 6A).

Biology. The few known hosts are in the family Erebidae.

Diversity. Seven described species, 10-20 more undescribed.

Distribution. Neotropics.

Publications. Meierotto et al. (2019b) described several species from Costa Rica and included the first host records.

Figure 16
Figure 16. Hemichoma donwhiteheadi Meierotto.

Labagathis Enderlein, 1920

Diagnosis. Tarsal claws cleft (couplet 4A). Ovipositor longer than metasoma (Fig. 17A). Propodeum with granulate sculpture (couplet 8A). Gena elongate (Fig. 17A).

Biology. Unknown

Diversity. L. rufoatra Enderlein is the sole described species and it may be the only species.

Distribution. Neotropical: Known from Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, and Suriname

Figure 17
Figure 17. Labagathis rufoatra Enderlein.

Lytopylus Foerster, 1862

Diagnosis. Mesoscutum smooth, lacking notauli (Fig. 18D). Claws simple with a basal lobe (couplet 4B). Third tergum smooth (Fig. 18D). Second submarginal cell of forewing large, lacking a petiole (Fig. 18E). Gena rounded posterolaterally (couplet 21B).

Biology. Recorded as parasitoids of the following families: Gelechiidae, Depressariidae, Oecophoridae.

Diversity. 39 described species and several hundred undescribed species.

Distribution. Restricted to the New World, from the northeastern USA south to Argentina, primarily Neotropical.

Publications. Kang et al. (2017) revised reared species from Costa Rica. Braet (2002) treated a number of Neotropical species, which he assigned to Earinus, however most of these belong to Lytopylus and were transferred by Sharkey et al. (2022).

Note. The revision by Sharkey et al. (2011a) employed the name Lytopylus in error and later Sharkey et al. (2016) transferred all of species erroneously described under Lytopylus in that paper to Aerophilus Szépligeti, 1902. Over past decades, Lytopylus was considered a junior synonym of Bassus Fabricius, Microdus Nees, or Agathis Latreille. Sharkey et al. (2016) removed the genus from synonymy and synonymized Agathellina Enderlein, 1920, Ditropia Enderlein, 1920, and Austroearinus Sharkey, 2006 under Lytopylus.

Figure 18
Figure 18. Lytopylus ericchapmani Kang (from Kang et al. 2017).

Marjoriella Sharkey, 1983

Diagnosis. Tarsal claws simple with a basal lobe (couplet 4B). Ovipositor shorter than metasoma (Fig. 19A). 2RS2 vein of forewing long and strong (Fig. 19D).

Biology. Unknown

Diversity. Four described species and probably a handful more undescribed.

Distribution. Rainforests of tropical South America.

Publications. Sharkey (1983) revised the species.

Note. Characters unique to members of Marjoriella are the projections that emanate ventrally from the propleura and mesopleura (Fig. 19C).

Figure 19
Figure 19. Marjoriella ancha Sharkey.

Mesocoelus Schulz, 1911

Diagnosis. Forewing venation greatly reduced (Fig. 20B). Hind legs elongate (Fig. 20A).

Biology. The sole recorded host is Acrocercops sp., Gracillariidae (Muesebeck, 1932).

Diversity. Three described species, about 10 undescribed.

Distribution. Recorded only from Caribbean islands and Brazil in the literature (Achterberg, 1990) but widespread in the Neotropics, e.g., Costa Rica, Colombia.

Publications. Bortoni and Penteado-Dias (2015) described a new species and presented a key to the three described species.

Figure 20
Figure 20. Mesocoelus sp.

Neothlipsis Sharkey, Parys and Clutts, 2011

Diagnosis. First tergum partly or completely granulate and lacking prominent pair of longitudinal carinae (couplet 22A). Third tergum lacking longitudinal striae, usually partly granulate (Fig. 21B). Notauli pitted (Fig. 21B). Gena not elongate (Fig. 21A). Frons not bordered by carinae or grooves posteriorly (couplet 11B).

Biology. Recorded as parasitoids of the following families: Gelechiidae, Crambidae, Tortricidae, Elachistidae, Coleophoridae.

Diversity. Ten described species and perhaps another 40 undescribed.

Distribution. Canada south to Costa Rica and the Lesser Antilles.

Publications. Sharkey et al. (2011b) erected the genus, transferred nine species from other genera and described a new species. Sharkey et al. (2021) described a species from Costa Rica.

Note. Members of this genus were formerly included in Bassus.

Figure 21
Figure 21. Neothlipsis agathoides (Newton & Sharkey).

Pharpa Sharkey, 1986

Diagnosis. Tarsal claws simple with a basal lobe (couplet 4B). Frons bordered posteriorly with carinae (couplet 11A); hind coxa lacking granulate sculpture (couplet 12B). First tergum smooth with two widely spaced converging carinae forming a tear-shaped basal area (couplet 13A, Fig. 22D).

Biology. Unknown, possibly Crambidae as in its sister group Alabagrus.

Diversity. Three described species and about a dozen undescribed.

Distribution. Neotropical, southern Mexico to northern Argentina.

Publications. Sharkey (1986) erected the genus and included three species.

Figure 22
Figure 22. Pharpa sp.

Plesiocoelus van Achterberg, 1990

Diagnosis. Forewing venation reduced (Fig. 23B), but not as extensively as that of Mesocoelus (couplet 1A). Metasomal tergum 1 with granulate or strio-granulate sculpture (Fig. 23C).

Biology. Depressariidae (rearing record in Janzen’s Costa Rican database (http://janzen.sas.upenn.edu/caterpillars/database.lasso)

Diversity. Four described species however not all of them belong in this genus. Bortoni and Penteado-Dias (2015) described two new species under Plesiocoelus however they both belong to other genera. Plesiocoelus anomalus Bortoni & Penteado-Días belongs in Therophilus [Therophilus anomalus (Bortoni & Penteado-Días, 2015) n. comb.] The evidence for this is in their figure 11, which shows the elongate Cub vein emanating from an angle in the basal cell of the hind wing. Plesiocoelus areolatus Bortoni & Penteado-Días belongs in Aerophilus, [Aerophilus areolatus (Bortoni & Penteado-Días, 2015) n. comb.] The evidence for this is in their figure 19, which shows the elevated medial portion of the first metasomal median tergite. There are probably about 10 undescribed species in the Neotropics.

Distribution. Rare but widespread in the Neotropics. Plesiocoelus also occurs in Southeast Asia (see below).

Publications. Achterberg (1990) erected the genus and included one species. Long and Achterberg (2016) described a new species from Vietnam. Bortoni and Penteado-Dias (2015) reported a range extension for P. bassiformis van Achterberg.

Figure 23
Figure 23. Plesiocoelus sp.

Pneumagathis Sharkey 2015

Diagnosis. Claws simple with a basal lobe (couplet 4B). Frons not bordered by carinae or grooves posteriorly (couplet 11B). Propodeal spiracle elongate (Fig. 24D).

Biology. Parasitic on a wide variety of grass feeding Hesperiidae (Janzen et al., 1998 [as Bassus]).

Diversity. Two described species, and probably fewer than 5 species undescribed, if any.

Distribution. Widespread in the Nearctic, Mexico, and Central America.

Publications. Sharkey and Chapman (2015) erected the genus and included two species. Janzen et al. (1998) elucidated the biology and host range of Pneumagathis erythrogastra Cameron (as Bassus brooksi Sharkey).

Figure 24
Figure 24. Pneumagathis spiracularis (Muesebeck).

Sesioctonus Viereck, 1912

Diagnosis. Claws simple lacking a basal lobe (couplet 4A). Mesoscutum smooth (Fig. 25B). Notauli lacking (couplet 30A, Fig. 25B).

Biology. The single host record is from Erebidae (Viereck, 1912b)

Diversity. 32 described species and about 70 undescribed.

Distribution. Widespread but rarely collected in the Neotropics from Mexico to Brazil.

Publications. Briceño (2003) revised the genus. Sharkey and Briceño (2005) added five new species. Sulca and Sharkey (2012) added three new species and updated the key.

Figure 25
Figure 25. Sesioctonus sp.

Smithagathis Sharkey, 2017

Diagnosis. Notauli absent (Fig. 26C). Hind coxal cavity open (couplet 26A). Claws with basal lobe (couplet 4B). R1 of forewing curved and reaching margin far from apex of wing (Fig. 26F). Second submarginal cell small and petiolate (Fig. 26F).

Biology. Unknown.

Diversity. One described species and probably fewer than 10 undescribed.

Distribution. Known only from the type locality, which has an altitude of 3,660 meters in the Colombian Andes.

Publications. Sharkey and Chapman (2017) erected the genus and described the sole species.

Figure 26
Figure 26. Smithagathis davidsmithi Sharkey.

Therophilus Wesmael, 1837

Diagnosis. Posterior apex of scutellum with a distinct depression in the form of a semicircle or two distinct pits (couplet 23A). First tergum not granulate, rarely striogranulate (couplet 22B). Cub vein of hind wing long and partly tubular. Apical margin of subbasal cell angled (couplet 19A). Notauli impressed and sculptured (Fig. 27D). Claws with a basal lobe (couplet 4B);

Biology. Parasites of Tortricidae and Elachistidae.

Diversity. 44 described species, probably 200 undescribed species.

Distribution. Worldwide, in the New World the genus is more species rich in the Nearctic region.

Publications. Sharkey and Stoelb (2012) resurrected the genus, described 11 new species and transferred 33 species from Bassus, Agathis and Microdus.

Note. Most species were formerly included in Bassus.

Figure 27
Figure 27. Therophilus sp.

Trachagathis Viereck, 1913

Diagnosis. Frons bordered by grooves posteriorly (couplet 11A). Hind coxa with granulate sculpture (Fig. 28B). Second cubital sell of forewing small (Fig. 28C). Notauli impressed and sculptured (couplet 20A). Claws simple with a basal lobe (couplet 4B). Second submarginal cell reduced to a small point, rarely absent (Fig. 28C).

Biology. The sole host record is on Pyralidae.

Diversity. Three described species and about 10 undescribed species.

Distribution. Widespread in the Neotropical region.

Publications. Sharkey (2007) revised the genus.

Figure 28
Figure 28. Trachagathis rubricincta (Ashmead).

Zacremnops Sharkey and Wharton, 1985

Diagnosis. Claws cleft (couplet 4A). Forewing areolet quadrate, not or only slightly narrower anteriorly (Fig. 29B). Ovipositor as long as or longer than half the length of the metasoma (Fig. 29A). Body predominantly black (Fig. 29A). Frons not bordered by a carina posteriorly (couplets 11B).

Biology. Four species are known to be parasitoids of Crambidae.

Diversity. Five described species and perhaps about five undescribed.

Distribution. Southern USA to Argentina.

Publications. Sharkey (1990) revised the genus, synonymized several species, and presented a key. Sharkey et al. (2021) presented host data and illustrations for four species.

Figure 29
Figure 29. Zacremnops cressoni (Cameron).

Zamicrodus Viereck, 1912

Diagnosis. Propleuron with a distinct protuberance; gena expanded into an acute angle posteroventrally (couplet 21A). Notauli smooth, unsculptured (Fig. 30B). First tergum completely smooth and lacking pair of longitudinal carinae (Fig. 30B). Frons not bordered by carinae or grooves posteriorly (couplet 11B). Claws simple, with distinct basal lobe (couplet 4B).

Biology. There are two records of Z. brianbrowni Sharkey on Quasimellana sethos (Mabille) (Hesperiidae).

Diversity. Three described species, perhaps about eight undescribed species.

Distribution. Widespread from Costa Rica south to Brazil.

Publications. Viereck (1912a) and Brullé (1846) each described a species. Sharkey et al. (2021) described a new species and included the first host records.

Figure 30
Figure 30. Zamicrodus sp.

Zelomorpha Ashmead, 1900

Diagnosis. Gena not modified into a flange posteriorly (couplet 4B). Forewing areolet triangular or if quadrate much narrower anteriorly (Fig. 31B). Ovipositor shorter than half the length of metasoma (Fig. 31A, C). Claws cleft (couplet 4A).

Biology. The following families are recorded as hosts of Zelomorpha species: Erebidae, Euteliidae, Lasiocampidae, Noctuidae, Nolidae, Notodontidae.

Diversity. 74 species described and hundreds more are undescribed. Some Old World species are assigned to Zelomorpha, but these all belong other genera such as Disophrys Förster, Biroia Szépligeti, and Coccygidium Saussure.

Distribution. Southern USA to Brazil.

Publications. Descriptions are scattered in numerous publications. Meierotto et al. (2019a) revised 15 species from Costa Rica, included host records, and transferred all described species placed in other genera to Zelomorpha (Meierotto et al. 2019b). Sarmiento et al. (2004) described the first known gregarious species of Zelomorpha (as Coccygidium).

Figure 31
Figure 31. Zelomorpha angelsolisae Meierotto.

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Ilgoo Kang, Erika Tucker and Gavin Broad for their careful reviews. Thank you to Steve Marshall for the use of his photograph on the cover-page.

References

Balduf, W.V. 1966. Life of Acrobassis rubrifasciella (Lepidoptera: Phycitidae), its main parasite, Agathis calcarata (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and three hyperparasites (Chalcidoidea). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 59: 1038-1049. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/59.6.1038.

Berta, D.C. 2000. Contribucion sobre las especies neotropicales del genero Earinus Wesmael (Hymenoptera: Braconidae, Agathidinae). Boletin de la Asociacion Española de Entomologia, 24: 229-241. Available from http://hdl.handle.net/11336/78424 [accessed February 2024].

Bibby, F.F. 1961. Notes on miscellaneous insects of Arizona. Journal of Economic Entomology, 54: 324-333. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/54.2.324.

Bortoni, M.A. and Penteado-Días, A.M. 2015. New species of Plesiocoelus van Achterberg and Mesocoelus Schulz (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) from Brazil. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 46: 61-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.46.6661.

Braet, Y. 2002. Contribution to the knowledge of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera Braconidae) from French Guiana with description of two new species of Earinus Wesmael, 1837. Belgian Journal of Entomology, 4: 41-51. Available from http://www.srbe-kbve.be/cm/belgian-journal-entomology-2002 [accessed February 2024].

Briceño, G.R.A. 2003. Taxonomic revision of the genus Sesioctonus Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research. 12: 238-271. Available from https://biostor.org/reference/310 [accessed February 2024].

Brullé, M.A. 1846. Tome Quatrième. Des Hyménoptères. Les Ichneumonides. In: Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau A. "Histoire Naturelles des Insectes." Paris. 680 pp. pp. 56-521.

Dondale, C.D. 1954. Biology of Agathis laticinctus (Cress.) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) a parasite of the eye-spotted bud moth in Nova Scotia. The Canadian Entomologist, 86: 40-44. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent8640-1.

Figueroa, J.I., Sharkey, M.J., Nápoles, J.R., García, J.A.S., Martinez, A.M., López-Martínez, V., and Pineda, S. 2011. Revision of the new world genus Crassomicrodus Ashmead (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae), with an identification key to species. Zookeys, 142: 27-75. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.142.1709.

Hummelen, P.J. 1974. Relations between two rice borers in Surinam, Rupela albinella (Cr.) and Diatraea saccharalis (F.), and their hymenopterous larval parasites. Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool, Wageningen, 74: 1-88. Available from https://edepot.wur.nl/197621 [accessed February 2024].

Janzen, D.H., Sharkey, M.J., and Burns, J.M. 1998. Parasitization biology of a new species of Braconidae (Hymenoptera) feeding on larvae of Costa Rican dry forest skippers (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Pyrginae). Journal of Neotropical Lepidoptera, 9: 33-41. Available from https://apps.sas.upenn.edu/caterpillar/index.php?action=retrieve&article=JanzenBassus1998.pdf [accessed February 2024].

Kang, I., Chapman, E.G., Janzen, D.J., Hallwachs, W., Solis, M.A., and Sharkey, M.J. 2017. Revision of the species of Lytopylus from Area de Conservación Guanacaste, northwestern Costa Rica (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae). ZooKeys, 721: 93-158. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.721.20287.

Leathers, J. and Sharkey, M.J. 2003. Taxonomy and life history of Costa Rican Alabagrus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), with a key to world species. Contributions in Science, 497:1–82. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.214390.

Long, K.D. and van Achterberg, C. 2016. A new species the genus Plesiocoelus van Achterberg (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae) from Vietnam. Tap chi Sinh hoc, 38: 304-309.  https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-7160/v38n3.8722.

Lindsay, C. and Sharkey, M.J. 2006. Revision of the genus Amputoearinus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae) with fourteen new species. Zootaxa 1329: 1-27. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1329.1.1.

Meierotto, S., Sharkey, M.J., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., Hebert, P.D.N., Chapman, E.G., and Smith, M.A. 2019a. A revolutionary protocol to describe understudied hyperdiverse taxa and overcome the taxonomic impediment. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 66: 119-145. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.66.34683.

Meierotto, S., Sharkey, M.J. and van Achterberg, C. 2019b. Taxonomic review of the genera Zelomorpha Ashmead and Hemichoma Enderlein (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae) with new combination assignments. Zootaxa, 4565: 131-137. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4565.1.11.

Morse, D.H. 2011. Size and development times of herbivorous host and parasitoid on distantly related foodplants. American Midland Naturalist, 166 :252-265. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-166.2.252.

Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1927. A revision of the parasitic wasps of the subfamily Braconinae occurring in America north of Mexico. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 69: 1-73. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.69-2642.1.

Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1932. The genus Mesocoelus Schulz (Hymenoptera, Braconidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 45: 227-230. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/48854 [accessed February 2024].

Needham, J.G. 1955. Notes on a leaf-rolling caterpillar and on some of its associates. Ecology, 36:346-352. https://doi.org/10.2307/1933247.

Nickels, C.B., Pierce, W.C., and Pinkney, C.C. 1950. Parasites of the pecan nut casebearer in Texas. Technical Bulletin, United States Department of Agriculture, 1011: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.156280.

Odebiyi, J. and Oatman, E.R. 1972. Biology of Agathis gibbosa (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a primary parasite of the potato tuberworm. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 65: 1104-1114. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/65.5.1104.

Odebiyi, J. and Oatman, E. R. 1977. Biology of Agathis unicolor (Schrottky) and Agathis gibbosa (Say) (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), primary parasites of the potato tuberworm. Hilgardia 45: 123-151. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v45n05p123.

Pucci, T. and Sharkey, M.J. 2004. A revision of Agathirsia Westwood (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae) with notes on mouthpart morphology. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 13: 64-107. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/36911 [accessed February 2024].

Quednau, F.W. 1970. Notes on life-history, fecundity, longevity and attack pattern of Agathis pumila (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a parasite of the larch casebearer. The Canadian Entomologist, 102: 736-745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent102736-6.

Sarmiento, C.E., Sharkey, M.J., and Janzen, D.H. 2004. The first gregarious species of the Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 13: 295-301. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/19219 [accessed February 2024].

Sharkey, M. 1983. Marjoriella, a new Neotropical genus of Agathidinae (Braconidae, Hymenoptera). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute, 20: 94-100.

Sharkey, M.J. 1986. Pharpa, a new genus of Neotropical Agathidinae (Hymenoptera, Braconidae) with a discussion of phylogenetic relationships. The Canadian Entomologist 118: 1231-1239. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent1181231-12.

Sharkey, M.J. 1988. A taxonomic revision of Alabagrus (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Entomology, 57: 311-437. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/78675 [accessed February 2024].

Sharkey, M.J. 1990. A revision of Zacremnops Sharkey and Wharton (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 92: 561-570. Available from https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/part/63972 [accessed February 2024].

Sharkey, M.S. 1997. Subfamily Agathidinae, pp.68-83. In: Wharton, R.A., Marsh, P.M., & Sharkey, M.J. (eds). Manual of the New World genera of Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Special Publication of the International Society of Hymenopterists, 439 pp.

Sharkey, M.J. 2006. Two new genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with a key to the genera of the New World. Zootaxa, 1185: 37-51. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1185.1.3.

Sharkey, M.J. 2007. Revision of the Neotropical genus Trachagathis Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae). Journal of the Entomological Society of Ontario, 137: 51-61. Available from https://www.entsocont.ca/uploads/3/0/2/6/30266933/137_51_61.pdf [accessed February 2024].

Sharkey, M.J. and Briceño, R. 2005. Review of Sesioctonus Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae) from Colombia with descriptions of five new species. Zootaxa, 1002:45-58. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1002.1.3.

Sharkey, M.J. and Stoelb, S.A.C. 2012. Revision of Therophilus s.s. (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae) from Thailand. Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 27: 1-36. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.27.2832.

Sharkey, M.J. and Chapman, E.G. 2015. The Nearctic genera of Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with a phylogenetic analysis, illustrated generic key and the description of three new genera. Zootaxa, 4000: 49-72. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4000.1.2.

Sharkey, M.J., Chapman, E.G., and de Campos, G.Y.I. 2016. Revision of Aerophilus Szépligeti (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae) from eastern North America, with a key to the Nearctic species. Contributions in Science, 524: 51-110. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.308968.

Sharkey, M.J. and Chapman, E.G. 2017. Phylogeny of the Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with a revised tribal classification and the description of a new genus. Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 119 (Special Issue): 823-842. https://doi.org/10.4289/0013-8797.119.SpecialIssue.823.

Sharkey, M.J, Chapman, E.G, Janzen, D.H, Hallwachs, W., and Smith, M.A. 2015. Revision of Aphelagathis (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae, Agathidini). Zootaxa, 4000: 73-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4000.1.3.

Sharkey, M.J., Laurenne, N.M., Sharanowski, B., Quicke, D.L.J., and Murray, D. 2006. Revision of the Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) with comparisons of static and dynamic alignments. Cladistics 22: 546–567. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00121.x.

Sharkey, M.J., Stoelb, S.A., Tucker, E.M., Janzen, D., Hallwachs, W., Dapkey, T., and Smith, M.A. 2011a. Lytopylus Forster (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae) species from Costa Rica, with an emphasis on specimens reared from caterpillars in Área de Conservación Guanacaste. ZooKeys, 130: 379-419 https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.130.1569.

Sharkey, M.J., Parys, K.A., and Clutts, S.A. 2011b. A new genus of Agathidinae with the description of a new species parasitic on Samea multiplicalis (Guenee). Journal of Hymenoptera Research, 23: 43-53. 53. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.23.1100.

Sharkey, M.J., Meierotto, S., Chapman, E.G., Janzen, D.J., Hallwachs, W., Dapkey, T., and Solis, M.A. 2018. Alabagrus Enderlein (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Agathidinae) species of Costa Rica, with an emphasis on specimens reared from caterpillars in Area de Conservación Guanacaste. Contributions in Science, 526: 31-180. https://doi.org/10.5962/p.320146.

Sharkey, M.J., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., Chapman, E.G., Smith, M.A., Dapkey, T., Brown, A., Ratnasingham, S., Naik, S., Manjunath, R., Perez, K., Milton, M., Hebert, P., Shaw, S.R., Kittel, R.N., Solis, M.A., Metz, M.A., Goldstein, P.Z., Brown, J.W., Quicke, D.L.J., van Achterberg, C., Brown, B.V., and Burns, J.M. 2021. Minimalist revision and description of 403 new species in 11 subfamilies of Costa Rican braconid parasitoid wasps, including host records for 219 species. ZooKeys, 1013: 1-665. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600.

Sharkey, M.J., Baker, A., Manjunath, R., and Hebert, P.D.N. 2022. Description of Chilearinus Sharkey gen. nov. and status of Nearctic Earinus Wesmael, 1837 (Braconidae, Agathidinae) with the description of new species. ZooKeys, 1099: 57–86. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1099.81473.

Sharkey, M., Athey, K.J., Fernández-Triana, J.L., Penteado-Dias, A.M., Monckton, S.K., and Quicke, D.L., 2023. Key to the New World subfamilies of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea). Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification, 49: 1-43. https://doi.org/10.3752/cjai.2023.49

Shaw, M.R., and Huddleston, T. 1991. Classification and biology of braconid wasps. Handbooks for the dentification of British Insects, 7: 1-126. Available from https://www.royensoc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Vol07_Part11.pdf [accessed February 2024].

Simbolotti, G. and van Achterberg, C. 1999. Revision of the west Palaearctic species of the genus Agathis Latreille (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae). Zoologische Verhandelingen Leiden. 325: 1-167. Available from https://repository.naturalis.nl/pub/317713 [accessed February 2024].

Simmonds, F.J. 1947. The biology of the parasites of Loxostege sticticalis L., in North America-Bracon vulgaris (Cress.) (Braconidae, Agathinae [sic]). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 38: 145-155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000748530003025X.

Sulca, L. and Sharkey, M.J. 2012. Three new species of Sesioctonus Viereck (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae) from Peru. Zookeys, 196: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.196.3086.

Tucker, E.M., Chapman, E.G., and Sharkey, M.J. 2015. A revision of the New World species of Cremnops Förster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Agathidinae). Zootaxa, 3916: 1-83. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3916.1.1.

Viereck, H.L. 1912a. Contributions to our knowledge of bees and Ichneumon-flies, including descriptions of twenty-one new genera and fifty-seven new species of Ichneumon-flies. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 42: 613-648. https://doi.org/10.5479/si.00963801.42-1920.613.

Viereck, H.L. 1912b. New genus and species of Hymenoptera of the family Braconidae from Panama. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, 59: 1-2. Available from https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/23460/1912%20SMC%20v59%20Viereck%20Hymenoptera%201-2.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y [accessed February 2024].

Wharton, R.A., Marsh, P.M., and Sharkey, M.J. (eds). 1997. Manual of the New World Genera of the Family Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Special Publication of the International Society of Hymenopterists, 439 pp.

Žikić, V., van Achterberg, C., Stanković, S.S., and Ilić, M. 2011. The male genitalia in the subfamily Agathidinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae): Morphological information of species on generic level. Zoologischer Anzeiger-A Journal of Comparative Zoology, 250: 246-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcz.2011.04.006.