ISSN 1911-2173

Key to the New World genera of Macrocentrinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea: Braconidae) and synopses of the genera

Accepted: December 10, 2024

Michael Sharkey1*

Robert Wharton2

Kees van Achterberg3

1Hymenoptera Institute, 1339 La Loma Dr., Redlands, California, 92373, USA.

2Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, U.S.A. (formerly)

3Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Key to the New World genera of Macrocentrinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea: Braconidae) and synopses of the genera

Key to the New World genera of Macrocentrinae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea: Braconidae) and synopses of the genera

Accepted: December 10, 2024

Michael Sharkey1*

Robert Wharton2

Kees van Achterberg3

1Hymenoptera Institute, 1339 La Loma Dr., Redlands, California, 92373, USA.

2Department of Entomology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, U.S.A. (formerly)

3Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Postbus 9517, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

* Corresponding author: [email protected]

Abstract

This is an updated overview of the New World (Western Hemisphere) members of Macrocentrinae. It is a revision of the keys by Wharton (1997) and Sharkey et al. (2021a) and contains a synopsis of each genus. The synopses include the following sections: diagnosis, biology, diversity, distribution, publications, and notes. There are four genera reported from the New World.

Macrocentrus sp., photo by Steve Marshall, Rondeau Provincial Park, Ontario, Canada.

Wharton, R.A. 1997. Subfamily Macrocentrinae, pp.310-313. In: Wharton, R.A., Marsh, P.M., and Sharkey, M.J. (eds). Manual of the New World Genera of the Family Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Special Publication of the International Society of Hymenopterists, 439 pp.

Sharkey, M.J., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., Chapman, E.G., Smith, M.A., Dapkey, T., Brown, A., Ratnasingham, S., Naik, S., Manjunath, R., Perez, K., Milton, M., Hebert, P., Shaw, S.R., Kittel, R.N., Solis, M.A., Metz, M.A., Goldstein, P.Z., Brown, J.W., Quicke, D.L.J., van Achterberg, C., Brown, B.V., and Burns, J.M. 2021a. Minimalist revision and description of 403 new species in 11 subfamilies of Costa Rican braconid parasitoid wasps, including host records for 219 species. ZooKeys, 1013: 1-665. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600

Introduction

Macrocentrinae is a moderately diverse subfamily containing four genera in the New World. Most of the described species belong to the genus Macrocentrus Curtis. Ahlstrom (2005) revised the species of North America north of Mexico, updating Muesebeck (1932). The latest generic synopsis is by van Achterberg (1993). Shaw and Huddleston (1991) provide a useful summary of the literature, with special reference to biology. New World specimens of Braconidae can be identified to subfamily using the key by Sharkey et al. (2023). Readers using that key will be automatically directed here if they obtain an identification of Macrocentrinae. The present work includes a key to the four New World genera, and a synopsis of each genus. The synopses include the following sections: diagnosis, biology, diversity, distribution, publications, and notes. Images are by Sharkey. General morphological terminology can be found in Sharkey et al. (2023) and in the Hymenoptera Anatomy Ontology Portal (http://portal.hymao.org/projects/32/public/ontology/).

Overview of subfamily

Phylogeny

No phylogenetic analyses at the genus level have been conducted. In a molecular phylogenetic study, Sharanowski et al. (2011) recovered Macrocentrinae as sister to Xiphozelinae and these were found to be sister to the clade Amicrocentrinae + Charmontinae.

Biology

The Macrocentrinae include both solitary and gregarious koinobiont endoparasitoids of lepidopterous larvae (Clausen, 1940; Shaw and Huddleston, 1991). Where known, the gregarious species are polyembryonic. Detailed biological information is available for two species, M. ancylivorus Rohwer (Daniel, 1932; Finney et al., 1947) and M. cingulum Brischke (as referred to in recent literature van Achterberg, 1993; Farahani et al., 2012) or with authorship incorrectly attributed to Reinhard or as M. grandii Goidanich (Parker, 1931; Ding et al., 1989) or as M. gifuensis Ashmead (a misidentification) in some of the more important earlier publications. Although only a single individual of M. ancylivorus emerges from its host, initial development is polyembryonic (Daniel, 1932). Details of the development of other macrocentrines are largely unknown. It is possible, however, that those species that emerge as solitary parasitoids (at least in Macrocentrus and Hymenochaonia Dalla Torre) are initially polyembryonic in their development. New World macrocentrines have been reared from 10 families of Lepidoptera (Yu et al, 2016; Sharkey et al. 2021a).

Many of the macrocentrines are pale colored and crepuscular to nocturnal. The species of Macrocentrus and Hymenochaonia have long ovipositors, often laying their eggs in early instars of hosts concealed in leaf whorls, stems, tubers, or rolled leaves. Austrozele Roman and Dolichozele Viereck, on the other hand, have short ovipositors, and the available records indicate that they attack exposed caterpillars, e.g., Arctiidae and Noctuidae.

Common genera

Macrocentrus and Hymenochaonia are the major New World genera. There are about 190 described species of Macrocentrus worldwide, and about one-fourth of these occur in the New World. The remaining 46 species of described macrocentrines are divided amongst seven other genera worldwide. We estimate that there are several hundred or more undescribed New World species.

Distribution

Cosmopolitan.

Distinguishing features

Macrocentrines can be recognized by the absence of an occipital carina and the presence of small teeth on the hind trochantellus (Fig. 1). With the exception of one known species, M. incompletus Muesebeck, all described species have three submarginal cells.

Note: In the generic treatments we give rough estimates of the number of undescribed species that may occur in the New World, e.g., “There are 26 BINs (proxies for species) from Costa Rica on the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD, Nov. 25, 2024), and we estimate that there may be a hundred or more undescribed species in the New World.” To arrive at these very conservative numbers we used estimates of the number of trees in Costa Rica compared to the remainder of the New World. Cazzolla Gatti et al. (2022) estimated there to be 40,123 species of trees in the New World. Nelson Zamora (personal communication), the leading Costa Rican botanist, estimates there to be 2,500 species of trees in Costa Rica, or ~6.2% New World fauna. Over the last ten years Dan Janzen, Winnie Hallwachs and their team have barcoded Malaise trap samples from all over Costa Rica, making it the best sampled country on the Barcode of Live Data System database, though it is far from complete. In the example above, if we were to assume that the 26 BINs represented 6.2% of the New World fauna we would arrive at an estimate of 419 species for the New World. However, we refrain from this detailed estimate and instead make the generalized and conservative estimate of “a hundred or more.”

Figure 1. Macrocentrinae are distinguished from other Braconidae in part by the presence of small teeth on the hind trochantellus, indicated by an arrow.

Checklist

Table 1. List of New World genera of Macrocentrinae

 Austrozele Roman, 1910

 Dolichozele Viereck, 1911

 Hymenochaonia Dalla Torre, 1898

 Macrocentrus Curtis, 1833

Key to genera

Key to the New World genera of Macrocentrinae
Modified from Sharkey et al. (2021a). Clicking the hyperlinked text in the key below will take the reader to the corresponding couplet or genus synopsis.
1.
A. Petiole with laterope shallow or absent; petiole flat or convex basal-medially
B. Petiole with laterope deep; petiole nearly always slightly depressed basal-medially
Figure for couplet 1
2(1).
A. Ovipositor long, ovipositor sheath at least as long as metasoma. AA. Length of inner (longest) spur of hind tibia 0.4-0.6 times length of hind basitarsus.
B. Ovipositor short, ovipositor sheath about equal to apical height of metasoma. BB. Length of inner (longest) spur of hind tibia usually (80%) 0.6-0.8 times length of hind basitarsus, if shorter then, BBB. Apex of the spur lacking setae.
Figure for couplet 2
Figure for couplet 2
3(1).
A. Ovipositor long, ovipositor sheath nearly always at least as long as metasoma. AA. Length of inner (longest) spur of hind tibia 0.3-0.5 times length of hind basitarsus.
B. Ovipositor short, about equal to apical height of metasoma. BB. Length of inner (longest) spur of hind tibia 0.5-0.8 times length of hind basitarsus.
Figure for couplet 3
Figure for couplet 3

Generic treatments

Austrozele Roman, 1910

Diagnosis. Petiole with laterope deep (couplet 2B); ovipositor short, about equal to apical height of metasoma (Fig. 2A).

Biology. Solitary parasitoids of Noctuidae (van Achterberg, 1993) and Geometridae (Sharkey et al., 2021a).

Diversity. There are 22 described species worldwide, two in the Nearctic and four in the Neotropical regions. Presently (Nov. 25, 2024) there are six BINs (proxies for species) from Costa Rica and 12 BINs from Canada on the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD). There may be close to 100 undescribed species in the New World.

Distribution. Cosmopolitan.

Publications. Ahlstrom (2005) revised the Nearctic species occurring north of Mexico. Sharkey et al. (2021a) described two new species from Costa Rica.

Figure 2. Austrozele sp.

Dolichozele Viereck, 1911

Diagnosis. Ovipositor much shorter than metasoma (Fig. 3A). Laterope weakly impressed or absent (couplet 1A).

Biology. Solitary parasitoids of Erebidae (Arctiidae in the literature) and Noctuidae (Sharkey et al., 2021a).

Diversity. Nine described species worldwide, with three in the Nearctic and three in the Neotropical regions. There may be several dozen more undescribed in the Neotropics.

Distribution. Nearctic, Neotropical, western Canada (British Columbia) south to Brazil.

Publications. Ahlstrom (2005) revised the Nearctic species occurring north of Mexico. Sharkey et al. (2021a) described two new species from Costa Rica.

Figure 3. Dolichozele sp.

Hymenochaonia Dalla Torre, 1898

Diagnosis. Ovipositor as long as or longer than the metasoma, usually at least as long as the body (Fig. 4A). Laterope weakly impressed or absent (couplet 1A).

Biology. Reared primarily from Pyralidae and Tortricidae. Allen (1962) summarized the biology of H. delicata (Cresson) (as Macrocentrus delicatus). Sharkey et al. (2021a) described species reared from Erebidae (Arctiidae in the literature), Depressariidae, Pyralidae, Crambidae, and Gelechiidae.

Diversity. 23 described species worldwide. There are 26 BINs (proxies for species) from Costa Rica on the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD, Nov. 25, 2024), and we estimate that there may be a hundred or more undescribed species in the New World.

Distribution. Holarctic, Neotropical (southern Canada to Argentina). Introduced into Europe for biological control of the Oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta (Busck), but not recovered.

Publications. Ahlstrom (2005) revised the Nearctic species occurring north of Mexico. Sharkey et al. (2021a) described 13 new species from Costa Rica

Figure 4. Hymenochaonia sp.

Macrocentrus Curtis, 1833

Diagnosis. Ovipositor as long as or longer than the metasoma, usually at least as long as the body (Fig. 5A). Laterope deeply impressed (couplet 1B). Most of the small specimens (less than 5 mm.) belong to this genus.

Biology. Most of the detailed work has been on polyembryonic species (overview in Shaw and Huddleston, 1991). Tortricidae and Pyralidae are the most frequently recorded hosts, however Sharkey et al. (2021a, b) recorded 16 species with Crambidae as hosts and also two with Depressariidae as hosts.

Diversity. About 210 species described worldwide, with 46 in the Nearctic and 29 in the Neotropical regions. There are 25 BINs (proxies for species) from Costa Rica and 35 BINs from Canada on the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD, Nov. 25, 2024), and we estimate that there are several hundred undescribed species in the New World.

Distribution. Cosmopolitan.

Publications. Ahlstrom (2005) revised the Nearctic species occurring north of Mexico. Sharkey et al. (2021a, b) described 21 new species from Costa Rica.

Figure 5. Macrocentrus sp.

Acknowledgements

We thank A.P. Ranjith and Caroline Boudreault for their reviews of the submitted manuscript and the editors of CJAI for their efforts.

References

Ahlstrom, K.R. 2005. Revision of the subfamily Macrocentrinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) in America north of Mexico. Thomas Say Publications in Entomology: Monographs. Entomological Society of America, Lanham. i-v, 274pp.

Allen, H.W. 1962. Parasites of the Oriental fruit moth in the Eastern United States. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, 1265: 25-26.

Clausen, C.P. 1940. Entomophagous Insects. McGraw-Hill, New York and London. 688pp.

Daniel, D.M. 1932. Macrocentrus ancylivorus Rohwer, a polyembryonic braconid parasite of the Oriental fruit moth. New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Technical Bulletin, 187: 1-101.

Ding, D., Swedenborg, P.D., and Jones, R.L. 1989. Chemical stimuli in host-seeking behavior of Macrocentrus grandii (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 82: 232-236. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/82.2.232

Farahani, S., Talebi, A.A., and Rakhshani, E. 2012. First records of Macrocentrus Curtis, 1833 (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Macrocentrinae) from Northern Iran. Zoology and Ecology, 22: 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21658005.2012.674676

Finney, G.L., Flanders, S.E., and Smith, H.S. 1947. Mass culture of Macrocentrus ancylivorus and its host, the potato tuber moth. Hilgardia, 17: 437-483.

Cazzolla Gatti, R., Reich, P.B., Gamarra, J.G., Crowther, T., Hui, C., Morera, A., Bastin, J.F., De-Miguel, S., Nabuurs, G.J., Svenning, J.C. and Serra-Diaz, J.M., 2022. The number of tree species on Earth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(6), p.e2115329119.

Muesebeck, C.F.W. 1932. Revision of the Nearctic ichneumon-flies belonging to the genus Macrocentrus. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 80(2923):1-55. Available online: https://repository.si.edu/bitstream/handle/10088/16047/USNMP-80_2923_1932.pdf

Parker, H.L. 1931. Macrocentrus gifuensis Ashmead, a polyembryonic braconid parasite in the European corn borer. United States Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin, 230: 1-62. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.163054

Sharanowski, B.J., Dowling, A.P., and Sharkey, M.J. 2011. Molecular phylogenetics of Braconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea), based on multiple nuclear genes, and implications for classification. Systematic Entomology, 36: 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.2011.00580.x

Sharkey, M.J., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., Chapman, E.G., Smith, M.A., Dapkey, T., Brown, A., Ratnasingham, S., Naik, S., Manjunath, R., Perez, K., Milton, M., Hebert, P., Shaw, S.R., Kittel, R.N., Solis, M.A., Metz, M.A., Goldstein, P.Z., Brown, J.W., Quicke, D.L.J., van Achterberg, C., Brown, B.V., and Burns, J.M. 2021a. Minimalist revision and description of 403 new species in 11 subfamilies of Costa Rican braconid parasitoid wasps, including host records for 219 species. ZooKeys, 1013: 1-665. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600

Sharkey, M.J., Baker, A., McCluskey, K., Smith, A., Naik, S., Ratnasingham, S., Manjunath, R., Perez, K., Sones, J., D’Souza, M., Jacques, B.S., Hebert, P., Hallwachs, W., and Janzen, D. 2021b. Addendum to a minimalist revision of Costa Rican Braconidae: 28 new species and 23 host records. ZooKeys, 1075: 77–136. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1075.72197

Sharkey, M., Athey, K.J., Fernández-Triana, J.L., Penteado-Dias, A.M., Monckton, S.K., and Quicke, D.L., 2023. Key to the New World subfamilies of the family Braconidae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea). Canadian Journal of Arthropod Identification, 49: 1-43. https://doi.org/10.3752/cjai.2023.49

Shaw, M.R and Huddleston, T. 1991. Classification and biology of braconid wasps (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects, 7: l-126. Available online: https://www.royensoc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Vol07_Part11.pdf

van Achterberg, C. 1993. Revision of the subfamily Macrocentrinae Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) from the Palaearctic region. Zoologische Verhandelingen Leiden, 286: 1-110. Available online: https://repository.naturalis.nl/pub/317629/ZV1993286001.pdf

Wharton, R.A. 1997. Subfamily Macrocentrinae, pp.310-313. In: Wharton, R.A., Marsh, P.M., and Sharkey, M.J. (eds). Manual of the New World Genera of the Family Braconidae (Hymenoptera). Special Publication of the International Society of Hymenopterists, 439 pp.